2013
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/2/026016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based rational feedback controller design for closed-loop deep brain stimulation of Parkinson's disease

Abstract: Our findings point to the potential value of model-based rational design of feedback controllers for Parkinson's disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that while the open-loop controller performs well, the amplitude of the stimuli using the closed-loop controller is smaller than when using open-loop controller, leading to considerable power savings. Similar results were observed in a study by Gorzelic et al (2013) that investigated optimization techniques for a model-based proportional-integrate-derivative controller in application to Parkinson's disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results show that while the open-loop controller performs well, the amplitude of the stimuli using the closed-loop controller is smaller than when using open-loop controller, leading to considerable power savings. Similar results were observed in a study by Gorzelic et al (2013) that investigated optimization techniques for a model-based proportional-integrate-derivative controller in application to Parkinson's disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In the last decade, there has been increasing interest from the research community and clinicians in implementing closed-loop stimulation strategies in neurobionic devices such as visual prostheses, cochlear implants, and spinal cord stimulation to relieve pain (Abbas and Chizeck 1991;Gorzelic et al 2013;Fountas et al 2005;Nelson et al 2011;Parker et al 2012;Rosin et al 2011;Vetter et al 2010;Zimmermann and Jackson 2014). These schemes adjust stimulation levels dynamically based on the response of neurons in real time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches using closed-loop stimulation are inherently state dependent and require computational neurostimulation (Cheng and Anderson, 2015;Gluckman et al, 2001;Gorzelic et al, 2013;Grahn et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2013;Priori et al, 2013;Shamir et al, 2015). As relevant and practical for any given approach, feedback can be based on output at any of the four stages: (1) recording of current flow patterns for a given dose (Datta et al, 2013b), (2) monitoring of cellular responses such as unit firing rat, (3) changes in network activity such as local field potentials (Bergey et al, 2015;Gluckman et al, 2001;Merlet et al, 2013), and (4) behavior (Shamir et al, 2015).…”
Section: Dealing With Unknowns and Multiscale Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional non-linear analytical tools need to be integrated in order to better identify non-linear hallmarks in the neuronal and global signals. The identification of such patterns could become relevant in future algorithms for closed-loop devices aimed to deliver on-demand anti-parkinsonian treatments (85). An additional research orientation would be to investigate whether the delivery of non-linear complex patterns could improve the benefit of DBS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%