2017
DOI: 10.3390/info8010007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Based Safety Analysis with smartIflow

Abstract: Verification of safety requirements is one important task during the development of safety critical systems. The increasing complexity of systems makes manual analysis almost impossible. This paper introduces a new methodology for formal verification of technical systems with smartIflow (State Machines for Automation of Reliability-related Tasks using Information FLOWs). smartIflow is a new modeling language that has been especially designed for the purpose of automating the safety analysis process in early pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the state calculation results of the logic Eqs. (6) and (7) also indicated that the top-level traffic surveillance function could be completed as the task state value remained larger than zero. Func_i.state…”
Section: Inherent Failure Situation: Traffic Antenna Failmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, the state calculation results of the logic Eqs. (6) and (7) also indicated that the top-level traffic surveillance function could be completed as the task state value remained larger than zero. Func_i.state…”
Section: Inherent Failure Situation: Traffic Antenna Failmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The State Machine for Automation of Reliability-related Tasks using Information FLOWs (SmartIflow) represents another MBSA method that has been designed to automate the safety analysis process [10,7,3], Compared to the formal safety analysis methods, this method possesses the advantages of dynamic behavior description and state transformation visualization. The state-based analysis methods have facilitated the dynamic evaluation of the failure effect, thus realizing the global perception of the safety state.…”
Section: Gang Xiaomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While certain techniques focus on making the analysis process more manageable, other MBDA techniques have been developed to address the limitations of traditional techniques [39]. The field of MBDA encompasses a large variety of techniques, such as HiP-HOPS workbench [40], FPTN [41], FPTC [42], SAML [43], smartIflow [44], AltaRica [45], and Figaro [46].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One classification criteria is the type of connection modelling [44]. Directed connections are commonly used in MBDA techniques, but in some situations the use of undirected connections helps to keep a model structure close to reality.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, traditional safety analyses (FTA, etc.) are usually based on informal system models, which are always regarded as incomplete, inconsistent, and error-prone [8]. Moreover, a consistent formal model is needed in both system design procedure and safety analysis procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%