2019
DOI: 10.1177/1729881419853713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based sensorless robot collision detection under model uncertainties with a fast dynamics identification

Abstract: This article presents a novel model-based sensorless collision detection scheme for human-robot interaction. In order to recognize external impacts exerted on the manipulator with sensitivity and robustness without additional exteroceptive sensors, the method based on torque residual, which is the difference between nominal and actual torque, is adopted using only motor-side information. In contrast to classic dynamics identification procedure which requires complicated symbolic derivation, a sequential dynami… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Towards this goal, it is imperative firstly, to detect the human-robot contact and secondly, distinguish between intentional and incidental contacts, a process called collision detection. Some researchers propose sensor-less procedures for detecting a collision based on the robot dynamics model [52,53], but through momentum observers [52,[54][55][56][57], using extended state observers [58], vibration analysis models [59], finite-time disturbance observers [56], energy observers [57], or joint velocity observers [60]. Among these methods, the momentum observer is the most common method of collision detection, because it provides better performance compared to the other methods, although the disadvantage is that it requires precise dynamic parameters of the robot [61].…”
Section: Contact Type Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Towards this goal, it is imperative firstly, to detect the human-robot contact and secondly, distinguish between intentional and incidental contacts, a process called collision detection. Some researchers propose sensor-less procedures for detecting a collision based on the robot dynamics model [52,53], but through momentum observers [52,[54][55][56][57], using extended state observers [58], vibration analysis models [59], finite-time disturbance observers [56], energy observers [57], or joint velocity observers [60]. Among these methods, the momentum observer is the most common method of collision detection, because it provides better performance compared to the other methods, although the disadvantage is that it requires precise dynamic parameters of the robot [61].…”
Section: Contact Type Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to extract the friction from the joint torque. A reliable method for the above problem was proposed by the authors of [ 37 ]. Considering that the speed direction is independent of the calculated joint torque by dynamics model, the two types of trajectories are characterized by the same position, acceleration, and speed value, and the opposite speed direction.…”
Section: Friction Modeling and Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, they are now offering different Industry 4.0 functionalities, connectivity, and simulation-related options, at least for their new and upcoming products [ 3 ]. Furthermore, related topics that have made undisputedly valuable contributions to novel industrial concepts are: collision detection and avoidance [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ], physical human–robot interaction [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ], kinesthetic guidance [ 19 , 20 , 26 ], motion planning, digital twins, augmented reality, and facilitated programming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%