2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based step-wise marginal CO2 abatement cost curves to determine least-cost decarbonization pathways for sector-coupled energy systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, holding the size of abatement increments constant, the resulting incremental (marginal) abatement cost is not always increasing as the firm selects more ambitious target levels E. Convex segments of the AC(•) curve emerge for both relatively high and relatively low emissions target levels but not in the mid-range. This lack of convexity stands in contrast to earlier studies on marginal abatement cost curves as popularized by McKinsey 16 and studied in numerous contexts [17][18][19][20][21] . A central assumption of marginal abatement cost curves in earlier work is that the abatement impact of different levers is separable, allowing for levers to be ordered by increasing marginal costs [54][55][56] .…”
Section: Cost-efficient Abatement Leverscontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Thus, holding the size of abatement increments constant, the resulting incremental (marginal) abatement cost is not always increasing as the firm selects more ambitious target levels E. Convex segments of the AC(•) curve emerge for both relatively high and relatively low emissions target levels but not in the mid-range. This lack of convexity stands in contrast to earlier studies on marginal abatement cost curves as popularized by McKinsey 16 and studied in numerous contexts [17][18][19][20][21] . A central assumption of marginal abatement cost curves in earlier work is that the abatement impact of different levers is separable, allowing for levers to be ordered by increasing marginal costs [54][55][56] .…”
Section: Cost-efficient Abatement Leverscontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…The social cost of the full decarbonization of the energy sector is captured by the sector specific marginal abatement cost curve, widely used in the literature with a well-established methodology. (Misconel et al, 2022)review the literature that defines carbon abatement cost curves by similar models. These approaches share the feature that they identify the least-cost response to the emission constraint, identifying the sectors and technologies where abatement happens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAC curves can be optimized using the modeling tool EnergyPLAN [174,175]. The EPLANopt MAC, a methodology used to determine the least-cost decarbonization pathway for sectorally coupled energy systems, has been expanded and applied [176] and was used in the study of hydrocarbon economics of transitioning from natural gas-fired generation to 100% renewable energy generation [177]. Compared with financial analysis methods, engineering modeling methods are more accurate, have a smaller margin of error, and are more influential when used to guide policy [178].…”
Section: Evolution Of Financial Analysis Methods Influenced By Uncert...mentioning
confidence: 99%