2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.4716252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model based studies of the split D differential eddy current probe

Abstract: The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headqu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the advantages associated with the surface differential probes, a growing number of researchers focused on the modelling of this type of configuration. Most of the current works are devoted to numerical modelling and parametric studies of split-D differential probes since the experimental tests may be time-consuming and costly [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. For instance, in the work developed by Mooers et al [15,16], the results obtained from two numerical software packages, namely VIC-3D and EC SIM, were compared with experimental measurements of a split-D probe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the advantages associated with the surface differential probes, a growing number of researchers focused on the modelling of this type of configuration. Most of the current works are devoted to numerical modelling and parametric studies of split-D differential probes since the experimental tests may be time-consuming and costly [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. For instance, in the work developed by Mooers et al [15,16], the results obtained from two numerical software packages, namely VIC-3D and EC SIM, were compared with experimental measurements of a split-D probe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the current works are devoted to numerical modelling and parametric studies of split-D differential probes since the experimental tests may be time-consuming and costly [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. For instance, in the work developed by Mooers et al [15,16], the results obtained from two numerical software packages, namely VIC-3D and EC SIM, were compared with experimental measurements of a split-D probe. VIC-3D and EC SIM were employed again to conduct a parametric sweep on the dimensions of each constituting component of a split-D probe, and the influence of each parameter on the recorded signals was studied as the probe scanned a notch [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The placement of D-shaped receiver coils in the housing and their differential configuration provide a small footprint and high signal to noise ratio. This could be translated into high detection sensitivity for surface cracks, reducing undesirable noises caused by the probe's lift-off and tilt [11,12]. The advantages of using this type of probe configuration become more pronounced when inspecting ferromagnetic materials (e.g., martensitic steels), since the ECT signals detected from these materials could be very noisy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of using this type of probe configuration become more pronounced when inspecting ferromagnetic materials (e.g., martensitic steels), since the ECT signals detected from these materials could be very noisy. Different studies have investigated the performance of split-D probes through model-based approaches [12][13][14][15][16][17], while some others have tried to perform modelbased inversion based on the flaws scanned by the probes [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From such probe categories, reflection differential split-D probe as a conventional ECT surface probe has served long in nuclear and aerospace industries owing to the spatial configuration of its differentially connected receiver coils. It has a very small footprint, high signal to noise ratio for tiny surface breakings and less sensitivity to gradual variations of both conductivity and permeability as compared to absolute configurations [1,2]. The impedance evaluation for this probe as it scans defective components requires finding a solution to the forward problem developed based on Maxwell's equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%