2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2022.102071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-based super-resolution reconstruction with joint motion estimation for improved quantitative MRI parameter mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of SRR on the heart [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] has so far only been shown for qualitative imaging. For T1 Mapping, SRR taking into account different motion states of the individual LR stacks has so far only been applied on the brain 20,32,33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of SRR on the heart [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] has so far only been shown for qualitative imaging. For T1 Mapping, SRR taking into account different motion states of the individual LR stacks has so far only been applied on the brain 20,32,33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Super-resolution methods aim to estimate an unknown HR MRI from one or more acquired low-resolution (LR) MRIs. Model-based methods assume an explicit imaging model of the MRI acquisition and seek a numerical solution of the ill-posed inverse problem by introducing regularization terms to constrain the solution space [6,7,8,9]. These model-based SR methods, however, require multiple multi-slice LR images to reconstruct one HR MRI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are relaxation times estimation with Markov Random Fields, 5 coherent region smoothness, 6,7 and total variation priors. 8,9 Other Bayesian methods address, for instance, intravoxel incoherent voxel modeling, 10,11 field map reconstruction, 12 myelin water fraction estimation, 13 and applications in dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI. [14][15][16] Other approaches address MRI signal denoising before the tissue parameter reconstruction, for example, with Marchenko-Pastur Principal Component Analysis 17 or Beltrami Denoising.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common approach is implementing a Bayesian framework to denoise the parameter reconstruction with a spatial prior distribution. Examples are relaxation times estimation with Markov Random Fields, 5 coherent region smoothness, 6,7 and total variation priors 8,9 . Other Bayesian methods address, for instance, intravoxel incoherent voxel modeling, 10,11 field map reconstruction, 12 myelin water fraction estimation, 13 and applications in dynamic contrast‐enhanced‐MRI 14–16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%