1991
DOI: 10.1002/tea.3660280107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model building and a definition of science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
88
0
43

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
88
0
43
Order By: Relevance
“…Other research studies stress the potential of modelling in developing epistemic skills (e.g. Carey & Smith, 1993;Pluta, Chinn, & Duncan, 2011) and fostering productive epistemologies of science (Gilbert S.W., 1991;Schwarz & White, 2005). Further studies highlight the benefits of modelling for developing fundamental life skills, such as awareness of the semantic relation between theory and phenomena (Gilbert J.K., 2004;Greca & Moreira, 2000), metaphorical competencies which underlie every language (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980) and analogical causal reasoning (diSessa, 2014;Harrison & Treagust, 2000).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research studies stress the potential of modelling in developing epistemic skills (e.g. Carey & Smith, 1993;Pluta, Chinn, & Duncan, 2011) and fostering productive epistemologies of science (Gilbert S.W., 1991;Schwarz & White, 2005). Further studies highlight the benefits of modelling for developing fundamental life skills, such as awareness of the semantic relation between theory and phenomena (Gilbert J.K., 2004;Greca & Moreira, 2000), metaphorical competencies which underlie every language (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980) and analogical causal reasoning (diSessa, 2014;Harrison & Treagust, 2000).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientists design models with a particular scientific purpose in mind, such as explaining, visualizing, or predicting the behaviour of a scientific phenomenon (Giere, 1990;Gilbert, 1991;Gilbert, et al, 1998;Justi & Gilbert, 2002;Schwartz & Lederman, 2008). Models cannot be completely accurate and are almost always tentative, in the sense that they are open to further revision and development (Crawford & Cullin, 2004).…”
Section: The Epistemological Status Of Models In Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models are used in research in all scientific disciplines (Gilbert, 1991). Obviously, such models differ in terms of content, appearance and function, and can be categorised accordingly (see e.g., Black, 1962;Boulter & Buckley, 2000;Giere, 1991;Gilbert & Boulter, 1997;Harrison & Treagust, 2000).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in some of our earlier work (De Vos, 1985;Van Driel & Verloop, 1999), we identified several common char-acteristics of scientific models on the basis of an analysis of the available literature. This literature consisted of publications from various domains, mainly the history and philosophy of science (e.g., Bertels & Nauta, 1969;Black, 1962;Giere, 1991;Hesse, 1966;Rothbart, 2004), and science education (e.g., Duit & Glynn, 1996;Gilbert, 1991;Gilbert & Boulter, 1997;Van Oers, 1988). In empirical studies, we have used these common features to develop and test educational materials, aimed at understanding the role and the nature of models in chemistry (De Vos, 1985;Van Hoeve-Brouwer, 1996), and to probe teacher's understanding of models and modelling in science (Van Driel & Verloop, 1999).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation