2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model calibration for building energy efficiency simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
80
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, a comparison of the monthly average values of the average radiant temperature, internal ambient temperature and operating temperature, obtained firstly in experimental and mathematical form (Table 4) The objective is to calibrate the simulated model to obtain in later simulations [13], [14]. The winter period is defined as the period from 1 December to 30 April, and the summer period from 1 May to 30 November.…”
Section: Monitored Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, a comparison of the monthly average values of the average radiant temperature, internal ambient temperature and operating temperature, obtained firstly in experimental and mathematical form (Table 4) The objective is to calibrate the simulated model to obtain in later simulations [13], [14]. The winter period is defined as the period from 1 December to 30 April, and the summer period from 1 May to 30 November.…”
Section: Monitored Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For integrated energy scenario analysis, where building and grid models need to be combined, a linear representation of building energy performance is 55 required. Integrated models of this nature will facilitate comprehensive building thermal performance assessment, such as building retrofit analysis or the effect of increased penetration of electrified space and water heating systems, in the context of wider integration of renewable energy generation into the electricity grid.…”
Section: Modelling Integrated Building and Grid Retrofit Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the room temperature may not reach the set-point. in the building modelling literature [55,56]. ASHRAE Guideline 14-2000 [57] states that a model can be deemed as calibrated if the CV(RMS E) deviates by less than 10% for annual metered energy data and 30% for hourly metered energy data.…”
Section: Lumped Parameter Model Calibration Via Particle Swarm Optimimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It involves tuning or refining initial input parameters in a heuristic manner, relying heavily on the experience and expertise of the modeler [27,28]. Manual calibration utilizes building characteristics data from audits, energy use and zone condition monitoring, or active functional testing, to gain an intimate knowledge of the physical and operational characteristics of the building [19,21,29]. Graphical techniques have been widely used in manual calibration to visually show the differences between measured and computed results, following manual parameter tuning [28,[30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three critical reasons to conduct model calibration are to provide improved accuracy of building energy performance models [16], provide insights into a building's thermal or electric hourly load shapes [17], and better predict the potential energy savings of energy conservation measures [18]. The calibration target is to match the simulated energy consumption [11,[19][20][21], indoor air temperature [6,22], operation conditions of HVAC equipment [18], and/or cooling/heating loads [6,18,23] to the actual measured data of the building, on a specific time scale. The calibration time scale usually depends on the calibration purpose and the accuracy level of available inputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%