2011
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2011.2170086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Comparison for $1/f$ Noise in Oscillators With and Without AM to PM Noise Conversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the obtained 1/ f additive phase noise analytic expression in ( 6) for the injection-locked oscillator becomes the 1/ f phase noise analytic expression Equation ( 14) in [18] when the injection-locking current source |I S | is neglected. Note also that the Ω 2 numerator and Ω 4 denominator terms in (6) can usually be neglected.…”
Section: /F Noisementioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Note that the obtained 1/ f additive phase noise analytic expression in ( 6) for the injection-locked oscillator becomes the 1/ f phase noise analytic expression Equation ( 14) in [18] when the injection-locking current source |I S | is neglected. Note also that the Ω 2 numerator and Ω 4 denominator terms in (6) can usually be neglected.…”
Section: /F Noisementioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this paper, an additive phase noise measurement system is used to (1) synchronize the oscillator using injection locking and (2) measure its additive phase noise. An analytic expression for the 1/ f additive phase noise of injection-locked negative-conductance oscillators is also derived using the generalized Kurokawa theory [17,18]. Note that the applicability of the behavioral Kurokawa theory to accurately model both low-and high-Q free-running oscillators in the presence and absence of AM-to-PM noise has been investigated in detail in [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that 1/f noise is observed in additive phase noise measurements instead of Laurentzian noise in both passivated and unpassivated devices. This suggests that a distributed network of acceptor traps may actually be involved .…”
Section: Device Modeling Gan Hemtsmentioning
confidence: 99%