Model-Controlled quantitative interpretation of 4D signatures in turbidite reservoirs

Almaskeri, Yahya Amer; Fulton, Jonathan; MacBeth, Colin

doi:10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.168.arq_192

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(2003). Further issues relating to other reservoir connectivity scenarios and stacking patterns in turbidite sands are discussed in a separate study (Al‐Maskeri and MacBeth 2003).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The 4D seismic signature of oil–water contact movement due to natural production in a stacked turbidite reservoir

MacBeth

Stephen

McInally

2005

Geophysical Prospecting

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A B S T R A C TCombined time-lapse reservoir simulation and seismic modelling has been performed on both 1D and 3D models of a channelized turbidite reservoir. The models have been built using core, log, laboratory and seismic data from the Nelson Field (central North Sea) as a template. Oil and water movement in the main channels, channel margins and interchannel regions is investigated, with a particular focus being the effect of poor net-to-gross. The analysis confirms that saturation effects dominate the response whilst stress-sensitivity effects play a minor role. The trough-peak signature in the seismic difference volumes formed by the sweep of the water can be continued and mapped slightly further than the channel margins. This characteristic 4D signature remains roughly intact, despite the complicated depositional architecture, and accurately delineates the area of moved fluid, but it needs additional calibration to combat the detrimental influence of the low net-to-gross. Signal strength is largely dependent on reservoir quality, but is also compromised by the net-to-gross, fluid distribution and, more critically, by the exact timing of the seismic survey. For example, a region of bypassed oil zone remains undetected as it forms early during the production. This work demonstrates that to understand fully the 4D signature at a quantitative level requires adequate knowledge of the fluid properties, but also, more critically, the geology.

show abstract

“…(2003). Further issues relating to other reservoir connectivity scenarios and stacking patterns in turbidite sands are discussed in a separate study (Al‐Maskeri and MacBeth 2003).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%