2018
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2018.2842197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-Driven Design of Microwave Filters Based on Scalable Circuit Models

Abstract: Most microwave filters are currently designed using direct electromagnetic (EM) optimization. This method holds several disadvantages regarding the provided physical insight to designers and duration of the optimization process. To circumvent these drawbacks, we propose a filter design based on scalable circuit models. This model-driven design competes with EM optimization by maintaining the accuracy of the optimization results while providing a very significant speedup and gaining physical insight on the EM w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1(a) at a certain initial design (---), the design optimized for the operating frequency of 2.0 GHz (-), as well as responses evaluated along the line segment connecting these two designs, and parameterized using 0  t  1 (grey lines); (b) conventional objective function (6) (---) and feature-based objective function (8) (-) as a function of t. It can be observed that the feature-based cost function is monotonic so that the optimum design is attainable through local search. This is not the case for the formulation(6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1(a) at a certain initial design (---), the design optimized for the operating frequency of 2.0 GHz (-), as well as responses evaluated along the line segment connecting these two designs, and parameterized using 0  t  1 (grey lines); (b) conventional objective function (6) (---) and feature-based objective function (8) (-) as a function of t. It can be observed that the feature-based cost function is monotonic so that the optimum design is attainable through local search. This is not the case for the formulation(6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Notwithstanding, the landscape of UF() is more regular than that of U(). Consequently, optimizing the coupler using (8) is, in generally, computationally cheaper than when using (6). As a matter of fact, the second penalty term in (8) can enforce monotonicity of the objective function profile so that the optimum solution is attainable even when starting from a relatively remote initial design (cf.…”
Section: B Assessing Design Quality Using Response Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The losses are introduced in References 4 and 5 by using a cascade of RLC‐tanks to model multiple antiresonances. In Reference 6, we proposed a parsimonious and accurate equivalent circuit model with losses to model the fundamental frequency for a DGS consisting of a single rectangular slot positioned perpendicularly to and symmetrically around the transmission line. Such a DGS is shown in Figure 1 (Middle).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a DGS is shown in Figure 1 (Middle). In Reference 7, we extended the equivalent circuit model from Reference 6 to a wide‐band model that is able to take into account multiple antiresonances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%