2009 ICSE Workshop on Multicore Software Engineering 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iwmse.2009.5071378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-driven development of multi-core embedded software

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using the newly introduced model-to-model transformations and generation support, it is now possible to automate the exploitation of this parallelism. In DSPE, unlike alternative approaches [3], [12], [17], [19], each application may now feature its specific event-driven scheduler and work-sharing/stealing infrastructure, and each software component may be handled with dedicated scheduling and coordination policies. This is a significant advantage in stream processing applications, where straightforward data divide-and-conquer [2], [12], [17] may not prove effective, for example, in the case of irregular data availability.…”
Section: Dynamic Scheduling and Code Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…By using the newly introduced model-to-model transformations and generation support, it is now possible to automate the exploitation of this parallelism. In DSPE, unlike alternative approaches [3], [12], [17], [19], each application may now feature its specific event-driven scheduler and work-sharing/stealing infrastructure, and each software component may be handled with dedicated scheduling and coordination policies. This is a significant advantage in stream processing applications, where straightforward data divide-and-conquer [2], [12], [17] may not prove effective, for example, in the case of irregular data availability.…”
Section: Dynamic Scheduling and Code Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In DSPE, unlike alternative approaches [3], [12], [17], [19], each application may now feature its specific event-driven scheduler and work-sharing/stealing infrastructure, and each software component may be handled with dedicated scheduling and coordination policies. This is a significant advantage in stream processing applications, where straightforward data divide-and-conquer [2], [12], [17] may not prove effective, for example, in the case of irregular data availability. In this context, dedicated infrastructure, scheduling and coordination policies help minimize the impact of load imbalances and other interfering factors.…”
Section: Dynamic Scheduling and Code Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations