2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model for assessing sustainability performance of agricultural cooperatives’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
2
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
17
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The most frequently reported indicators were in the economic and social performance categories and the lowest were in the environmental performance categories. These results are in line with the findings of Marcis et al (2019), who highlighted economic performance indicators as standing out in relation to other categories. This may be due to cooperatives using already-existing financial reporting and the increase in the number of financial reporting rules and standards, leading to the increase in the quantity of economic indicators reported.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The most frequently reported indicators were in the economic and social performance categories and the lowest were in the environmental performance categories. These results are in line with the findings of Marcis et al (2019), who highlighted economic performance indicators as standing out in relation to other categories. This may be due to cooperatives using already-existing financial reporting and the increase in the number of financial reporting rules and standards, leading to the increase in the quantity of economic indicators reported.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This could be attributed to the fact that cooperatives as a part of social enterprises must prioritise pertaining to the social needs of their members, namely improving the quality of lives and cohesiveness among the members of the cooperatives, emphasising the professional, health and safety of their workforce while promoting social responsibility in their own communities in terms of donation and creating employment to the underprivileged. This result is in line with Marcis, Pinheiro de Lima, et al (2019) who revealed that the social dimension of sustainability is in the DNA of the cooperatives for use in the formulation of sustainability strategies for agricultural cooperatives. This result also echoed with Dale et al (2013), who observed that the social dimension of sustainability was stronger than the environmental and economic dimensions, although other sustainability dimensions (economic and environment) were present in the cooperative.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This implies that offering high quality oil palm to the millers is not crucial to the oil palm cooperatives, indicating that the general tendency of the free-rider problems in conventional cooperative's operation (Ortmann & King, 2007;Soboh et al, 2009). The result also meets the indication of Marcis, Pinheiro de Lima, et al (2019) who revealed that although the economic dimension has stood out in comparison to the other dimensions, there is an increasing emphasis on social and environmental dimensions. Finally, the environmental dimension of SOP revealed the lowest loadings in oil palm cooperatives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following this approach, Castilla-Polo et al (2018) introduced a combined measurement for cooperatives' performance to assist in the complexity of cooperatives' operations in the management context. Later, Marcis et al (2019) created the Sustainability Assessment for Agricultural Cooperatives (SAAC), where there is a specific category for controlling the cooperative nature and the partners' role in a similar way. Both works justify our starting point with this variable.…”
Section: Responsible Research and Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%