2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2011.12.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model for radiation damage buildup in GaN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3). This clearly shows the high importance of the secondary defect formation processes in radiationinduced stable damage accumulation in GaN, as suggested in [47]. Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3). This clearly shows the high importance of the secondary defect formation processes in radiationinduced stable damage accumulation in GaN, as suggested in [47]. Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…SAL formation indicates that the surface is a nucleation site for point defects. It was earlier shown that the lattice amorphization rate at the surface linearly increases with the amount of point defects coming to the amorphous/crystalline interface [47,48]. Overlapping of individual collision cascades formed by atoms comprising the PFn molecule locally increases cascade density at the sample surface and, in turn, increases the number of point defects produced by molecular ions in the surface vicinity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Interestingly a similar mechanism has been put forward to explain a fluence dependent shift of a bulk damage peak in GaN [23]. Evidently, this process requires that the effective diffusion length of the mobile point defects is comparable to or higher than the distance between the defect generation region and the sample surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Due to the close proximity of these collisions, a considerable amount of momentum is transferred to the surface lattice and the displaced atoms within the 7 nm spot could experience multiple impacts within a short period of time. This effect as well as lower cohesive energy between surface atoms relative to the bulk crystal increases the likelihood of ejection of surface atoms or those close to the surface and is believed to be responsible for the observed disorder in the top GaN surface. The second layer was consistently found to have a lower lattice disorder, most likely, due to the channeling of Ga ions traveling parallel to ⟨0001⟩, which enhances the Ga ion travel range and reduces its sputtering rate …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%