2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2010.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model for solvent viscosity effect on enzymatic reactions

Abstract: Why reaction rate constants for enzymatic reactions are typically inversely proportional to fractional power exponents of solvent viscosity remains to be already a thirty years old puzzle. Available interpretations of the phenomenon have not led to consensus among researches about its origin. They invoke to either a modification of 1. the conventional Kramers' theory or that of 2. the Stokes law. We show that there is an alternative interpretation of the phenomenon at which neither of these modifications is in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different dielectric constants could explain different abilities to recognize cellulose, since solvent polarity affects the strength of noncovalent interactions either the ones involved in CBM N1 binding (Aquino et al 2002) or in the structure stability of CBM N1, which has a relatively low maximum stability compared to other single-domain globular proteins (Creagh et al 1998). The factor viscosity would work against the binding in vegetable oil (Sitnitsky 2010) but given the duration of the experiment and the mechanical agitation, viscosity may play a minor role.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different dielectric constants could explain different abilities to recognize cellulose, since solvent polarity affects the strength of noncovalent interactions either the ones involved in CBM N1 binding (Aquino et al 2002) or in the structure stability of CBM N1, which has a relatively low maximum stability compared to other single-domain globular proteins (Creagh et al 1998). The factor viscosity would work against the binding in vegetable oil (Sitnitsky 2010) but given the duration of the experiment and the mechanical agitation, viscosity may play a minor role.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the observed rate of the ATP hydrolysis corresponded to the rate of the action of the enzyme (25-27 turnovers per s), while ATP synthesis is provided by the rate of 200-280 rps and could be even 400-600 rps [16]. It is logical to assume that the limiting stage in the case of the relatively slow Ca 2+ dependent hydrolysis is the inhibition of conformational changes of the enzyme during catalysis due to the increase in the intramolec ular friction [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This can be recorded experimentally by inhibi tion of the activity of a particular enzyme in the presence of viscosity increasing reagents. On the other hand, the increase in the viscosity can influence the processes by the mechanism of intramolecular fric tion, i.e., can affect the enzyme itself by slowing the conformational transitions in its active center [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors limit the maximum molecular weight of the polymer obtained by enzymatic polymerization under the conditions of a pure monomer melt or its solution in a particular solvent, whereas an increase in temperature leads to inactivation of the biocatalyst. In addition, with an increased viscosity, the activity of the enzyme and the rate of polymer synthesis decrease [ 220 , 221 ].…”
Section: Biocatalysis Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%