2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41396-018-0085-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model formulation of microbial CO2 production and efficiency can significantly influence short and long term soil C projections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microbial parameters are typically estimated from short‐term studies and it is still unclear to what extent these parameters can be extrapolated to longer time scales. Indeed, microbial responses to warming change over time (Ballantyne & Billings, ; Walker et al, ), for example, the progressive shifts from cellulase to ligninase activities identified in this meta‐analysis. Thus, keeping microbial parameters constant with warming duration may lead to inaccurate ESM predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Microbial parameters are typically estimated from short‐term studies and it is still unclear to what extent these parameters can be extrapolated to longer time scales. Indeed, microbial responses to warming change over time (Ballantyne & Billings, ; Walker et al, ), for example, the progressive shifts from cellulase to ligninase activities identified in this meta‐analysis. Thus, keeping microbial parameters constant with warming duration may lead to inaccurate ESM predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Assuming assimilation efficiency is temperature sensitive rather than maintenance respiration would cause models to overestimate the response of soil C stocks to temperature. In addition, Ballantyne and Billings (2018) found that whether respiration is modeled as function of biomass or as a function of uptake can also produce different transient responses in modeled SOC stocks, suggesting differences between these two processes might be even larger under dynamic environmental conditions like those modeled at the Earth system level. Currently most of the data on soil microbial CUE comes from studies using the C isotopic tracer method, which mainly reflects microbial assimilation efficiency.…”
Section: Implications For Models and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wealth of emerging experimental and observational data have led to questions about the validity of this approach, suggesting instead that a diverse suite of microbial responses to the thermal regime drives soil C losses with warming (Frey, Lee, Melillo, & Six, ; Hagerty et al, ; Karhu et al, ; Walker et al, ). Furthermore, a proliferation of new models explicitly including microbial physiological and community dynamics show that soil C persistence and vulnerability to warming strongly depend on how such microbial processes are represented (Allison, Wallenstein, & Bradford, ; Ballantyne IV & Billings, ; Georgiou, Abramoff, Harte, Riley, & Torn, ). However, the validity of these representations, and hence their ability to build confidence in hypothesized microbial and soil C responses to warming, is still compromised because projections are rarely tested against measured data across a wide range of temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%