2019
DOI: 10.1107/s1600576719003534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-independent recovery of interfacial structure from multi-contrast neutron reflectivity data

Abstract: Neutron specular reflectivity at soft interfaces provides sub-nanometre information concerning the molecular distribution of thin films, while the application of contrast variation can highlight the scattering from different parts of the system and lead to an overall reduction in fitting ambiguity. Traditional modelling approaches involve the construction of a trial scattering length density profile based on initial speculation and the subsequent refinement of its parameters through minimization of the discrep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Briefly, prior knowledge of the system, such as the substrate, component, and solution nSLDs and the expected interfacial arrangement, is used to construct a model of the interfacial structure. However, if these are unknown, then new tools are available which will provide a starting point for the analysis . The model is used to generate a model reflectivity profile, and least-squares fitting is used to repeat interactions of the model parameters until a fit between the model and experimental data is achieved.…”
Section: Neutron Experiments and Data Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Briefly, prior knowledge of the system, such as the substrate, component, and solution nSLDs and the expected interfacial arrangement, is used to construct a model of the interfacial structure. However, if these are unknown, then new tools are available which will provide a starting point for the analysis . The model is used to generate a model reflectivity profile, and least-squares fitting is used to repeat interactions of the model parameters until a fit between the model and experimental data is achieved.…”
Section: Neutron Experiments and Data Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if these are unknown, then new tools are available which will provide a starting point for the analysis. 146 The model is used to generate a model reflectivity profile, and least-squares fitting is used to repeat interactions of the model parameters until a fit between the model and experimental data is achieved. The SLD/model parameters are then interrogated to produce an understanding of the interfacial assemblage.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the 10 and the 300 K data sets were fitted simultaneously to provide further constraint to the fits. This is analogous to the isotropic contrast matching , used in soft matter neutron reflectivity experiments. This is very important in this case due to the attempt to measure a thin layer of graphene within a limited total Q range for PNR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Several different 'model-independent' approaches for the reconstruction of interfacial structure from reflectivity measurements have been reported, based either on experimental (Majkrzak & Berk, 1998;Majkrzak et al, 2003Majkrzak et al, , 2000 or on numerical/stochastic methods (Pedersen, 1992;Hohage et al, 2008;Kunz et al, 1993;Zhou & Chen, 1993;Koutsioubas, 2019). However, the vast majority of investigations in the literature rely traditionally on model-dependent refinements, where the interface is modelled as a stratified medium (succession of slabs) with prior knowledge about the system being embodied in the bounds and relations between the sld, thickness and roughness of each slab.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%