2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.physc.2005.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model inverse calculation of current distributions in the cross-section of a superconducting cable

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also use the fact that , which can take into account linear ( constant) or nonlinear conductors without distinction (the field dependence will be considered afterwards). We thus end up with equations of the type (18) In order to eliminate in the previous equation, we use the results of Section II to express as a function of all unknowns in the system, which gives the following expression for each term (in matrix form):…”
Section: A Matrix Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also use the fact that , which can take into account linear ( constant) or nonlinear conductors without distinction (the field dependence will be considered afterwards). We thus end up with equations of the type (18) In order to eliminate in the previous equation, we use the results of Section II to express as a function of all unknowns in the system, which gives the following expression for each term (in matrix form):…”
Section: A Matrix Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such problems require an accurate relationship between and the source term . Previous workers used simpler version of the Biot-Savart integral for rectangular conductors [18], but the new formulas for triangular elements introduced in this paper may allow studying more complex geometries.…”
Section: B Inverse Problems For Nonrectangular Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%