2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2012.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model of cholera dissemination using geographic information systems and fuzzy clustering means: Case study, Chabahar, Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Data of geographic parameters were processed using geographic information system (GIS) and used as inputs of statistical analysis and neural network models (11).…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Data of geographic parameters were processed using geographic information system (GIS) and used as inputs of statistical analysis and neural network models (11).…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographical parameters included elevation and distances of villages from district health center, rural health centers, national eastern border, the nearest river and subterranean canal. Using geographic information systems, these parameters were quantified through geographical layers as discussed in previous article (11).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Geographical information systems (GIS) can be applied for risk mapping and identifying endemic areas for diseases (Elnaiem et al, 2003;Rinaldi et al, 2006;Pezeshki et al, 2012). For example, Bhunia et al (2011) studied the influence of the distribution of inland water bodies on transmission of VL and presence of its dominant vector in a GIS model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…discussion Kwan 2012). Furthermore, distances in epidemiological and demographic research are either defined on interval scale (e.g., Pezeshki et al 2012) or on ordinal scale (using distance intervals, cf. Staedke et al 2003).…”
Section: Impact Of Geographic Context In Demographic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%