2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model order selection for approximate Boolean matrix factorization problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In logistic regression function, one of the methods to judge the binary prediction accuracy of the model is to use confusion matrix. The confusion matrix includes four parameters [4,5]: TP (True Positive) represents the number of benign people in this study who were correctly predicted by the model compared to the real data FP (False Positive) represents the number of benign people in this study who were incorrectly predicted by the model compared to the real data TN (True Negative) represents the number of malignant people in this study who were correctly predicted by the model compared to the real data FN (False Negative) represents the number of benign people in this study who were incorrectly predicted by the model compared to the real data precision = TP TP + FP recall = TP TP+FN (5) Because the value predicted by the model is the possibility of malignancy, this paper classifies the value of prediction result greater than 0.5 as 1 (malignant), and the value of prediction result less than 0.5 as 0 (benign). After the prediction by AIC, the confusion matrix was obtained as follows: According to the above results, AIC has higher accuracy than BIC, so AIC model is better than BIC model in this data set.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In logistic regression function, one of the methods to judge the binary prediction accuracy of the model is to use confusion matrix. The confusion matrix includes four parameters [4,5]: TP (True Positive) represents the number of benign people in this study who were correctly predicted by the model compared to the real data FP (False Positive) represents the number of benign people in this study who were incorrectly predicted by the model compared to the real data TN (True Negative) represents the number of malignant people in this study who were correctly predicted by the model compared to the real data FN (False Negative) represents the number of benign people in this study who were incorrectly predicted by the model compared to the real data precision = TP TP + FP recall = TP TP+FN (5) Because the value predicted by the model is the possibility of malignancy, this paper classifies the value of prediction result greater than 0.5 as 1 (malignant), and the value of prediction result less than 0.5 as 0 (benign). After the prediction by AIC, the confusion matrix was obtained as follows: According to the above results, AIC has higher accuracy than BIC, so AIC model is better than BIC model in this data set.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For higher rank matrices and decompositions, the average of the scores of all rank one factors is taken, after the decompositions are permuted to maximize the scores. For reference, we also report results of other Boolean model selection strategies: (1) Minimum Description Length (MDL) [32] and (2) Covarge Quality (CQ) [37]. While BMFk focuses on the solution stability, MDL minimizes the description of the data using the BMF model and CQ measures the change of the angle in the coverage (or reconstruction) curve.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%