Model Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Pemilu / Pemilukada

Abstract


 The state election/election of the regional head should be run as what is mandated in Pancasila and after regulations. The Election Commission/Regional Commission of Election as the organizer should drafted a comprehensive operational procedure of election referring to the regulations. The aim is for all contestants to not commit any fraud during election such as corruption. The method of research used in this writing was juridical empirical that is a research on some of the state administrations running for the election/the head of region election who were indicated committing corruption during election/election of the head of region. The steps after was to make an inventory, study, and examination on the secondary data such as Law No. 20, 2001 on the amendment of Law No. 31, 2001 concerning The Eradication of Corruption; Law No. 8, 2010 on Money Laundering and Law No. 7, 2017 concerning Election. Factors causing the state administrations to commit corruption during election/election of the head of region are internal such as greed, lust, and external factor such as political system of the state and the third factor that is factor of interest. The eradication model of corruption to be imposed on the state administrations during the election/election of the head of region is by criminally processing those accussed to commit corruption during election/election of the regional head and to enforce maximum punishment to promote deterrent effect.
 Keywords: corruption, elections, honesty, integrity.

The Role of the Election Supervisory Board (BAWASLU) in Preventing Criminal Actions of Corruption in Elections in Indonesia

“…Prevention and prosecution of criminal acts of corruption during elections will be successful when all elements of law enforcement agencies work together to help each other, work hand in hand with the KPU and Bawaslu to create fair, transparent, and honest elections with integrity. 31…”

Corruption Loops in Indonesia During 2004-2019 (The Need for Protection Whistleblower)

“…The problem that is often faced by a Whistle-Blower is not getting appreciation, the lack of support, protection, let alone adequate respect or appreciation for them (Anwar Usman, and A.M. Mujahidin, 2014). Weak guarantees of legal protection for the important role of a Whistle-Blower in the criminal justice process in order to reveal the material truth of a crime, it is necessary to have a legal rule that clearly and explicitly regulates protection for Whistle-Blowers.…”

“…There are not a few losses to the state from bribery in the mining and forestry sector, therefore it is necessary to have Whistle-Blowers who have the courage to tell the truth so that it is only natural that Whistle-Blowers must receive legal protection. The problem that is often faced by a Whistle-Blower is not getting appreciation, the lack of support, protection, let alone adequate respect or appreciation for them (Anwar Usman, and A.M. Mujahidin, 2014). Weak guarantees of legal protection for the important role of a Whistle-Blower in the criminal justice process in order to reveal the material truth of a crime, it is necessary to have a legal rule that clearly and explicitly regulates protection for Whistle-Blowers.…”

Pemilu Adil dan Bermartabat: Suatu Tinjauan Sistem Hukum Lawrence M. Friedman

“…Pada dasarnya politik bersinergi dengan kekuasaan yang artinya orang berpolitik akan melakukan berbagai cara untuk bisa mendapatkan kekuasaan, bahkan mekakukan perbuatan yang jahat seperti melakukan politik uang untuk mendapatkan kekuasaan. 46 Dalam kenyataan pemilihan umum di Indonesia, praktik politik uang ini sudah menjadi tindakan yang lumrah terjadi. Hal ini membuat berbagai pihak menjadi cemas akan berlangsungnya demokratisasi di Indonesia.…”