2020
DOI: 10.1080/14680629.2020.1753100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model performance assessment in resilient modulus modelling: a multimodel approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 for PC 1 and PC 2, which suggests that there is a pattern in the data. This preclusion of a random distribution is an indication of heterogeneity of variances in the data, which is a common observation for the LTPP data utilized in this study [ 25 ]. This lends credence to the adoption of a multivariate method for the descriptive analysis, which is independent of any prior data conformance in the original data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3 for PC 1 and PC 2, which suggests that there is a pattern in the data. This preclusion of a random distribution is an indication of heterogeneity of variances in the data, which is a common observation for the LTPP data utilized in this study [ 25 ]. This lends credence to the adoption of a multivariate method for the descriptive analysis, which is independent of any prior data conformance in the original data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the class of soils from which the data was obtained includes the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) soil classes A1 to A3, which represent the coarse-grained soils used as unbound granular materials for road pavements. The spatial variability in the extracted soil properties was incorporated by considering different strategic highway research program numbers as reported in a previous study [ 25 ]. The spatial variability was ensured within each of the different US counties that include Wisconsin, Iowa, Delaware, Kansas, Oklahoma, Michigan, Louisiana, Utah, North Dakota and Washington, from which the data were acquired.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations