2014
DOI: 10.3182/20140824-6-za-1003.01631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Predictive Control for Power System Frequency Control Taking into Account Imbalance Uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the RNMPC showed to be more conservative when more realistic, fluctuating disturances were imposed on the system, it is still less conservative than the RNMPC in Ersdal et al (2014). The main reason for this difference is that in Ersdal et al (2014) there was only one input per area, whereas here there are several.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Even though the RNMPC showed to be more conservative when more realistic, fluctuating disturances were imposed on the system, it is still less conservative than the RNMPC in Ersdal et al (2014). The main reason for this difference is that in Ersdal et al (2014) there was only one input per area, whereas here there are several.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The main reason for this difference is that in Ersdal et al (2014) there was only one input per area, whereas here there are several. Several inputs per area makes it easier for the RNMPC to fulfill the system constraints, also in case of worst-case disturbance scenarios, and it does not need to be as conservative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations