2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3088937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Predictive Control Method for Autonomous Vehicles Using Time-Varying and Non-Uniformly Spaced Horizon

Abstract: This paper proposes an algorithm for path-following and collision avoidance of an autonomous vehicle based on model predictive control (MPC) using time-varying and non-uniformly spaced horizon. The MPC based on non-uniformly spaced horizon approach uses the time intervals that are small for the near future, and time intervals that are large for the distant future, to extend the length of the whole prediction horizon with a fixed number of prediction steps. This MPC has the advantage of being able to detect obs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the lower controller, the optimal torque was carried out to provide it to each tire. Noticeably, one of the limitations of the MPC was the large number of short time steps of prediction, leading to computational costs [27]; hence it is difficult to ensure the real-time requirements of the system [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the lower controller, the optimal torque was carried out to provide it to each tire. Noticeably, one of the limitations of the MPC was the large number of short time steps of prediction, leading to computational costs [27]; hence it is difficult to ensure the real-time requirements of the system [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e goal of MPC is to compute a future control sequence in a defined horizon that can drive the vehicle close to the reference path. is is accomplished by minimizing a multistage cost function with respect to the future control actions, considering a set of constraints both in the control actions and the plant outputs [21]. Different methods, such as PP, Stanley, Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), and MPC with Ackermann steering model are investigated [22], and these methods are tested on different shape paths in simulation experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%