2016 Indian Control Conference (ICC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/indiancc.2016.7441109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model predictive control of a laboratory gas turbine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The guidelines required for Modelling of GT is provided in [8,[21][22][23][24]. Also, experimental empirical transfer function models for gas turbines (GT) can be done [17].…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The guidelines required for Modelling of GT is provided in [8,[21][22][23][24]. Also, experimental empirical transfer function models for gas turbines (GT) can be done [17].…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validated parameters of 7F Gas Turbine [16][17][18][19][20] used in the GGOV1 MATLAB /Simulink model, for implementing the model in the GE Control Systems Toolbox are listed in the following table:…”
Section: Parameter Validation For 7f Gas Turbinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the simulation was only carried around the nominal conditions. 11 In the study by Seok et al, 12 the linear state-space model of the gas turbine was identified from the input–output data of the nonlinear model near a nominal operating point, then the rate-based MPC controller was designed. Although linear MPC can be effectively solved during the optimization phase, it would lead to poor closed-loop performance when the gas turbine operates far from the nominal operating point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, H ∞ synthesis algorithms [7], single neural adaptive propositional-integral-derivative PID controllers [8] and non-linear controllers based on a linear control-loop with an exogenous non-linearity [4] have been developed to handle the process non-linearities. On the other hand, model uncertainty has been handled through model predictive control in [9,10]. Control schemes focused on disturbance rejection have also been developed, such as those based on local optimum PID controllers [11] and those based on Active Disturbance Rejection Control ADRC schemes [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%