2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0967-0661(99)00163-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model predictive control of an electric arc furnace off-gas process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar expressions can also be found in Eqs. (13), (15) and (18), where their interpretation is similar as here.…”
Section: Solid Scrap Zone (Ssc)mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Similar expressions can also be found in Eqs. (13), (15) and (18), where their interpretation is similar as here.…”
Section: Solid Scrap Zone (Ssc)mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Further, CO gas from furnace operations has been used successfully with significant economic and environmental benefits in a number of different industries around the world, including some applications in South Africa. In the steel industry particularly, CO gas from furnace operations (furnace CO gas) is used for the pre-heating of scrap, for the continuous charging of furnace feed material ( [8]), and for model predictive control in the automation of manually-controlled variables such as the forced-draught fan power and the airentrainment slip-gap width for the furnace off-gas process [9]. Another industry application that uses furnace CO gas is the co-generation of electricity.…”
Section: Opportunity For Improvement and Potential Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature review of the existent EAF models [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] indicates a lack of accurate arc models that could be applied for smart sensing, control or optimization of the energy flows. It is assumed that such model should present specific features that support their industrial application, including minimum input requirement, sufficient accuracy, simple mathematics and short calculation times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The share of convective heat transfer when air is employed to form plasma in an EAF was predicted at 72.5%, which is more than the expected value. 20,21) The second group involves models, which describe all significant parts of the EAF process; [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] however, those models hardly consider arc energy dissipation, except Logar et al, 18,19) who assumed constant values for arc energy distribution (i.e. 20% convective heat, 75% radiation heat, 2.5% of the energy transferred to gas zone and 2.5% of the energy lost to electrodes) and Ghobara 20) who as well as Logar et al 18,19) considered constant coefficients for the heat transferred from the arc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%