2015 International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icar.2015.7251458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model predictive path planning with time-varying safety constraints for highway autonomous driving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By assuming the worst case scenario, the motion planner is made towards robustness. Jalalmaab et al, [256] designed a model predictive controller (MPC) with timevarying safety constraints for path planning with collision avoidance. The proposed controller takes the road boundary and dynamic change of surrounding vehicles into the constraints consideration and finds the best commands of longitudinal and lateral control to navigate the AV.…”
Section: Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By assuming the worst case scenario, the motion planner is made towards robustness. Jalalmaab et al, [256] designed a model predictive controller (MPC) with timevarying safety constraints for path planning with collision avoidance. The proposed controller takes the road boundary and dynamic change of surrounding vehicles into the constraints consideration and finds the best commands of longitudinal and lateral control to navigate the AV.…”
Section: Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The point-mass kinematic equations of motion describing vehicle motion in the longitudinal direction [18] is given by…”
Section: Reachability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MPC performs well particularly in dynamic environments by embedding the prediction models of surrounding road users into the constraints of the optimization problem [2]. Consequently, MPC has been applied to complex driving scenarios in the presence of other road users, such as lane changing [3]- [5], obstacle avoidance [6], [7], pedestrian avoidance [8], [9], adaptive cruise control (ACC) [10], and turning and crossing at intersections [11], [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%