2015
DOI: 10.1002/pamm.201510053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model reduction and clustering techniques for crash simulations

Abstract: Model reduction in car crash simulations is a fairly new research field. In this paper, a possible workflow is presented: Since nonlinear behavior can occur, parts with linear and nonlinear behavior need to be separated with clustering methods such as k-means or spectral clustering. For the latter, a nonlinear reduction technique such as POD-DEIM needs to be applied. A longitudinal chassis beam of a 2001 Ford Taurus is used to examine the different clustering methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[26][27][28] However, linear MOR methods for a nonlinear problem would result in a large error, and the usage of nonlinear MOR techniques is normally very expensive and code intrusive. 29,30 The nonlinear MOR methods may be divided into three main categories, the discrete empirical interpolation method (DEIM), 31,32 the a priori hyper reduction (APHR), 33 and the proper generalized decomposition (PGD) proposed methods based on the gappy proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) method. [34][35][36] Furthermore, the modal derivatives-based MOR method has been widely applied in the nonlinear dynamic analysis.…”
Section: The Basic Theory Of the Reslto Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27][28] However, linear MOR methods for a nonlinear problem would result in a large error, and the usage of nonlinear MOR techniques is normally very expensive and code intrusive. 29,30 The nonlinear MOR methods may be divided into three main categories, the discrete empirical interpolation method (DEIM), 31,32 the a priori hyper reduction (APHR), 33 and the proper generalized decomposition (PGD) proposed methods based on the gappy proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) method. [34][35][36] Furthermore, the modal derivatives-based MOR method has been widely applied in the nonlinear dynamic analysis.…”
Section: The Basic Theory Of the Reslto Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core of the method is to compute the coefficients of the regression O solving the optimization problem (7). In this part, the computation method of the coefficients is outlined.…”
Section: Numerical Computation Of the Coefficients Of The Reduced Ordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods allow the use of partial or incomplete data (sample mesh in the DEIM and truncated integration domain in the APHR) to build a reduced order model. It is proposed in [7,8] to identify the parts having a non-linear behaviour and the parts having a linear behaviour using a clustering technique and to solve the non-linear problem with the DEIM and the linear part with Krylov subspaces [9]. As well as the APHR [10], this recent method has been applied to crash simulation but it seems limited to particular parts or small models with a low number of parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M e ·q e + k e (q e , t) = h e (1) with mass matrix M e ∈ R N×N , elastic stiffness vector k e (q e , t) ∈ R N and applied forces h e ∈ R N solved with explicit time solver (LS-DYNA) tremendous simulation times and energy consumption due to highly detailed Finite Element models. Apply model order reduction for speedup for separation and understanding effects, a racing kart crashing against a pole as a surrogate model for research crash simulations possess three basic sources of nonlinearities in mechanics: large deformation nonlinear material behavior multiple contact scenarios internal forces k e = k e (q e ,q e , t, .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“….) are nonlinear Reduction Approach Substructuring: Separation of the model in parts with linear and parts with nonlinear behaviour [1]. Apply model reduction only to linear part with k e = K e · q e (K e is stiffness matrix).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%