2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model reduction and optimal parameters of mid-story isolation systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research was conducted by reviewing several alternative locations for story isolation, and it was found that for systems with a single-story isolator, the effectiveness of using the isolator decreases with increasing isolator locations, or in other words, the best location for story isolator is between level 1 and level 2. Zhou et al, in 2016, simplified the building model with story isolators and obtained the optimum parameters of the isolator used. In the example section of numerical calculations for a 16-story building, it is found that the smallest level of roof deformation and shear forces are experienced by structures that are isolated at the lower level.…”
Section: *Corresponding Authormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research was conducted by reviewing several alternative locations for story isolation, and it was found that for systems with a single-story isolator, the effectiveness of using the isolator decreases with increasing isolator locations, or in other words, the best location for story isolator is between level 1 and level 2. Zhou et al, in 2016, simplified the building model with story isolators and obtained the optimum parameters of the isolator used. In the example section of numerical calculations for a 16-story building, it is found that the smallest level of roof deformation and shear forces are experienced by structures that are isolated at the lower level.…”
Section: *Corresponding Authormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This isolation strategy basically converts the mass of the isolated superstructure into a non-conventional tuned mass damper (Reggio and De Angelis 2015); therefore, the superstructure performs a dynamic control function in addition to the structural one. In general, it is possible to identify three behavioural categories-mass damping, intermediate isolation and base isolation-based on the mass ratio between the superstructure and substructure (Faiella and Mele 2019;Zhou et al 2016;Tan et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, general studies on the optimisation of FVDs for such applications, addressed to their design, are missing. In fact, relevant studies in the literature mainly deal with the optimal arrangement of multiple isolation systems in buildings (Charmpis et al 2012;Charmpis et al 2015) and the optimal values of the isolator parameters (Reggio et al 2015;Zhou et al 2016). As for FVDs, many optimisation strategies are available for traditional applications in frames (e.g., see De Domenico et al 2019), whereas only a few studies in the field of bridges deal with the optimisation of FVDs used together with isolators, focussing on linear dampers (Xie et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27] compared different optimization approaches, minimizing the variance of the responses (i) in displacement or (ii) in acceleration of the primary structure, or (iii) maximizing the energy dissipated by the TMD system (like [26]). [28] provided the equations for optimal TMD tuning, using a 2 DOF reducedorder model without damping in the main structure, minimizing (i) the maximum amplitudes of the base shear force under harmonic excitations, or (ii) the variance of the base shear force under a band-limited random excitation of white noise. [21], similarly to [25], proposed a TMD optimization approach that approximately equals the damping ratios of the 2 DOF system and, at the same time, minimizes its overall response; in particular, in addition to minimizing the FRF of the displacement of the primary structure, as done by [25], [21] simultaneously minimized the FRF of the acceleration of the nonconventional TMD, holding the latter also structural functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%