1985
DOI: 10.1016/0016-0032(85)90017-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model reduction for a class of linear dynamic systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) by substituting Eq. (6) gives the reduced denominator coefficients as the solution of: ⋯ (8) (or) Pe = q in matrix vector form Eq. (8) is equivalent to equating all the significant time moments ( ) and markov parameters ( ) of ( ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(4) by substituting Eq. (6) gives the reduced denominator coefficients as the solution of: ⋯ (8) (or) Pe = q in matrix vector form Eq. (8) is equivalent to equating all the significant time moments ( ) and markov parameters ( ) of ( ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A serious drawback of this method is generating unstable reduced model for a stable higher order model. To overcome this problem Shoji et al [6] suggests using a least squares time moment to obtain a reduced transfer function denominator, and numerator by exact time moment matching. This method has been refined by Lucas and Beat [7], in which the linear shift point was about general point "a", where a≈(1-α) and -α is the real part of the smallest magnitude pole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To remedy this situation, several variants of the method have been proposed. One such technique [8] suggests using a least-squares time moment fit to obtain a reduced transfer function denominator, and then obtain the numerator by exact time matching. A suggestion to make this technique [8] less sensitive to the pole distribution of the original system, was proposed by Lucas and Beat [9], in which the linear shift point was about a general point 'a', where a~l-a) and -a is the real part of the smallest magnitude pole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such technique [8] suggests using a least-squares time moment fit to obtain a reduced transfer function denominator, and then obtain the numerator by exact time matching. A suggestion to make this technique [8] less sensitive to the pole distribution of the original system, was proposed by Lucas and Beat [9], in which the linear shift point was about a general point 'a', where a~l-a) and -a is the real part of the smallest magnitude pole. The method of model order reduction by least squares moment matching was generalized [10] by including the Markov parameters in the process to cope with a wider class of transfer functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A serious drawback of this method is generating unstable reduced model for a stable higher order model. To overcome this problem Shoji et al [6] suggests using a least squares time moment to obtain a reduced transfer function denominator, and numerator by exact time moment matching. This method has been refined by Lucas and Beat [7], in which the linear shift point was about general point 'a', where a≈(1α) and -α is the real part of the smallest magnitude pole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%