1995
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1995.0451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model reduction using dynamic and iterated IRS techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
153
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
153
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This method does not require a solution of the full-system eigenvalues, but it can reduce the system with better accuracy to predict the low-frequency resonances than static reduction. Friswell et al [10] extended the IRS method by using the dynamic reduction as the basic transformation instead of static reduction. They also introduced an iteratively generated correction term using the best available estimate of the reduced model to converge to the modal parameters of the full system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method does not require a solution of the full-system eigenvalues, but it can reduce the system with better accuracy to predict the low-frequency resonances than static reduction. Friswell et al [10] extended the IRS method by using the dynamic reduction as the basic transformation instead of static reduction. They also introduced an iteratively generated correction term using the best available estimate of the reduced model to converge to the modal parameters of the full system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, by modal analysis using the reduced mass and stiffness, the natural frequency f could be obtained for objective function calculation. In the step, many model reduction techniques developed can be adopted, such as Guyan reduction method (Guyan 1965), Improved Reduced System (IRS) (O'Callahan 1989), Iterated Improved Reduced System (IIRS) (Friswell et al 1995), and Kuhar reduced method (Kuhar and Stahle 1974) and so on. Influences of the proposed OSP strategy using different model reduction techniques on optimal results will be discussed in section.…”
Section: Osp Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed methods are compared with the Guyan reduction (Guyan, 1964) and the Improved Reduction System (IRS) method (Friswell et al, 1995) on the one hand, and with three Second-Order Balanced Truncation (SOBT) methods on the other.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%