2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2258814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Risk, Mortality Heterogeneity and Implications for Solvency and Tail Risk

Abstract: Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials contained in any third party website referenced in this work. Contents List of Figures ix List of Tables xiii Notes on Contributors xv 1. Recreating Retirement Sustainability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e single premiums with different ages and genders are shown in Table 6. It should be noted that, according to the insurance practice, we calculate the payment period as 60 years old, and the calculation of the above cost starts at 65 years old due to insufficient data in the 60-65-year-old sample, so we first discount the total cost to 60 years old according to (11) and then calculate the premium according to (12). As seen in Table 6, the single premium for the males at the age of 25 years old is 0.351 and that for women is 0.752.…”
Section: E Single Premiummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e single premiums with different ages and genders are shown in Table 6. It should be noted that, according to the insurance practice, we calculate the payment period as 60 years old, and the calculation of the above cost starts at 65 years old due to insufficient data in the 60-65-year-old sample, so we first discount the total cost to 60 years old according to (11) and then calculate the premium according to (12). As seen in Table 6, the single premium for the males at the age of 25 years old is 0.351 and that for women is 0.752.…”
Section: E Single Premiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another weakness is that the result is average without considering initial health status, which means healthy and unhealthy people have the same trajectory of health changes and the same care cost. Obviously, its results will fail to meet the actuarial requirements [12][13][14]. erefore, dynamic methods are proposed to resolve these problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%