2004
DOI: 10.1080/10635150490522304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Selection and Model Averaging in Phylogenetics: Advantages of Akaike Information Criterion and Bayesian Approaches Over Likelihood Ratio Tests

Abstract: Model selection is a topic of special relevance in molecular phylogenetics that affects many, if not all, stages of phylogenetic inference. Here we discuss some fundamental concepts and techniques of model selection in the context of phylogenetics. We start by reviewing different aspects of the selection of substitution models in phylogenetics from a theoretical, philosophical and practical point of view, and summarize this comparison in table format. We argue that the most commonly implemented model selection… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
2,211
0
26

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,550 publications
(2,245 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
8
2,211
0
26
Order By: Relevance
“…Bayesian inference (Rannala and Yang, 1996) was conducted using MrBayes version 3.1.2 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck, 2003) using the model estimated by Modeltest 3.7 (Posada and Buckley, 2004;Posada and Crandall, 1998). The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm was run for 2000,000 generations with four incrementally heated chains, starting from a random tree and sampling one out of every 100 generations.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian inference (Rannala and Yang, 1996) was conducted using MrBayes version 3.1.2 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck, 2003) using the model estimated by Modeltest 3.7 (Posada and Buckley, 2004;Posada and Crandall, 1998). The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm was run for 2000,000 generations with four incrementally heated chains, starting from a random tree and sampling one out of every 100 generations.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum likelihood (ML) analysis as implemented in PAUP¤ 4.0b10 (SwoVord, 2002) with TBR branch swapping (10 random addition sequences). The best-Wtting nucleotide substitution model was selected by using Modeltest 3.7 (Posada and Crandall, 1998;Posada and Buckley, 2004). Bayesian inference of likelihood was implemented by using MrBayes version 3.1 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck, 2003) with partitioned strategies.…”
Section: Sequence Analysis and Molecular Datingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated the appropriate models of nucleotide substitution for each locus using Modeltest v3.7 (Posada and Crandall, 1998), and used the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) to select the model of molecular evolution that best fit the data (Posada and Buckley, 2004). To test for saturation, we used PAUP v.…”
Section: Dna Extraction Sequencing and Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%