1997
DOI: 10.1109/78.558486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model selection through a statistical analysis of the global minimum of a weighted nonlinear least squares cost function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, weights have been considered in the cost functions (Shadmand et al, 2019) for attaining multiple control objectives for power electronic interfaces. Co-variance weighted nonlinear least-square cost functions are presented in Pintelon et al (1997) for model identification applications. Time-delay estimation over highly oscillatory objective functions, with applications in sonar, as observed in Wu and Li (1998), has been attained for Cramer-Rao bounds [see also Toh and Eng (2008) for weighted least-square learning].…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, weights have been considered in the cost functions (Shadmand et al, 2019) for attaining multiple control objectives for power electronic interfaces. Co-variance weighted nonlinear least-square cost functions are presented in Pintelon et al (1997) for model identification applications. Time-delay estimation over highly oscillatory objective functions, with applications in sonar, as observed in Wu and Li (1998), has been attained for Cramer-Rao bounds [see also Toh and Eng (2008) for weighted least-square learning].…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inadequate choice of an initial function may result in models that fail to accurately capture the intrinsic dynamics of the data. This limitation becomes particularly apparent in intricate biological processes like rumen fermentation, where these methods may not offer reliable insights or predictions [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%