The SAGE Handbook of Research Methods in Political Science and International Relations 2020
DOI: 10.4135/9781526486387.n42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Specification and Spatial Interdependence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we checked whether spatial autocorrelation in the outcome was caused by observable or unobservable effects. We found that the spatial-autoregressive lag model (which we did not apply) could be re-expressed as a higher-order variation of the SDEM (consistent with Franzese and Hays (2014) or Cook et al (2015)). Moreover, we calculated the means of the log-likelihood, the log-likelihood ratio, and the Moran's I of residuals, as recommended in LeSage (2014); Cook et al (2015); and Vega and Elhorst (2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, we checked whether spatial autocorrelation in the outcome was caused by observable or unobservable effects. We found that the spatial-autoregressive lag model (which we did not apply) could be re-expressed as a higher-order variation of the SDEM (consistent with Franzese and Hays (2014) or Cook et al (2015)). Moreover, we calculated the means of the log-likelihood, the log-likelihood ratio, and the Moran's I of residuals, as recommended in LeSage (2014); Cook et al (2015); and Vega and Elhorst (2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We found that the spatial-autoregressive lag model (which we did not apply) could be re-expressed as a higher-order variation of the SDEM (consistent with Franzese and Hays (2014) or Cook et al (2015)). Moreover, we calculated the means of the log-likelihood, the log-likelihood ratio, and the Moran's I of residuals, as recommended in LeSage (2014); Cook et al (2015); and Vega and Elhorst (2015). All of the tests confirmed that the SDEM suits the context of regional matching functions better than the SLX, GNS, and SDM (see Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SDEM is a combination of the spatially lagged-X (SLX) model that assumes the effect of the explanatory variables of the neighboring areas on the outcome variable of the area (spillover effect), and the spatial error model (SEM), which assumes the interaction between the unobserved variables in neighboring areas and the area (46)(47)(48). We believe that the local spillover effect was more appropriate as the outcome variable of the current study was a social aggregate (49,50). We constructed the row-standardized queen contiguity spatial weights of This study used the "splm" package in R 3.6.3 (https://www.r-project.org), and QGIS 3.12.1…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growth in the use of spatial econometric models in political science is partly a consequence of improvements in the techniques used to estimate and interpret increasingly complex specifications (e.g., Beck et al, 2006;Franzese and Hays, 2006;Ward and Gleditsch, 2008;Darmofal, 2015). Though the theories used to justify spatial models are varied (see e.g., Shipan and Volden, 2008, for policy diffusion), these models typically focus on three types of spatial processes (Cook et al, 2015): clustering in the outcomes (i.e., when y i influences y j and vice versa), clustering in the unobservables (i.e., when ϵ i is correlated with ϵ j ), and clustering in the observables (i.e., when x i influences y j ). Most political science research has focused on two particular models, the SAR and the spatial-X (SLX) models.…”
Section: Spatial Econometric Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%