1985
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9169(85)90037-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model studies of the D-region negative-ion composition during day-time and night-time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, it is similar in most respects to other models of the D region which have appeared in the literature over the last 30 years (e.g. Barabash et al, 2012;Kazil et al, 2003;Thomas and Bowman, 1985). One difference with some other models is a simplifying assumption that OASIS makes concerning negative ions.…”
Section: The Oasis Modelmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, it is similar in most respects to other models of the D region which have appeared in the literature over the last 30 years (e.g. Barabash et al, 2012;Kazil et al, 2003;Thomas and Bowman, 1985). One difference with some other models is a simplifying assumption that OASIS makes concerning negative ions.…”
Section: The Oasis Modelmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…which is not in the Torkar and Friedrich table, but is reaction R17 of Thomas and Bowman (1985). As discussed by Friedrich et al (1998) and Barabash et al (2012), historical impediments to a reliable model-data comparison of the electron density are the uncertainties in such quantities as the NO and O. Friedrich et al (1998) used HALOE data to narrow down the possible range of the NO; here we use the SABER data discussed above to constrain not only the O, but also the O 3 and the O 2 ( 1 Δ).…”
Section: The Oasis Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Note that besides negative dust also negative ions, which were not measured in the frame of the WADIS mission, are an important player in the charge balance in the lower D region (e.g., Baumann et al, 2013Baumann et al, , 2015Plane et al, 2014;Asmus et al, 2015). Nevertheless, negative ion density (predominantly NO − 3 and O − 2 at night around 80 km) are thought to rapidly decrease above 80 km during nighttime due to destruction by atomic oxygen (Thomas and Bowman, 1985;Friedrich et al, 2012;Plane et al, 2014;Baumann et al, 2015). In situ measurements of O density (not shown here) on WADIS-2 show a rapid increase above ∼ 77 km, which supports the assumption that negative ions play only a minor role in the charge balance at those heights.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The height distribution of the O 3 -density in the mesosphere, its seasonal and diurnal variations and the secondary peak have been explained by theoretical investigations and by modelling Laird, 1970, 1972;Ogawa and Shimazaki, 1975;Swider et al, 1978;Keneshea et al, 1979;Thomas and Bowman, 1985;Rodrigo et al, 1986;Sandor et al, 1997;Marsh et al, 2003;Jackman et al, 1995Jackman et al, , 2005. The primary chemical production mechanism for odd oxygen in the thermosphere and mesosphere is photodissociation of molecular oxygen.…”
Section: Height Profiles Of Ozone In the Mesospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 by curves 1-3 (Shimazaki and Laird, 1972;Rodrigo et al, 1986;Thomas and Bowman, 1985). Deviations in the concentration of ozone between O 3 -profiles 1-3 can be explained by differences in accounting for solar radiation intensity in different wavelength ranges, in absorption cross sections, in values of eddy diffusion coefficient, in concentration of atomic oxygen and other species, in rate constants of reactions and in other factors applied in the model studies.…”
Section: Height Profiles Of Ozone In the Mesospherementioning
confidence: 99%