2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2022.104735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model test and numerical analysis for the face failure mechanism of large cross-section tunnels under different ground conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The definition of the stress release rate at any point around the tunnel can be obtained by the ratio of the reduction in the constraint stress to the initial stress. The stress release rate is deduced as follows [27]:…”
Section: Stress Release Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition of the stress release rate at any point around the tunnel can be obtained by the ratio of the reduction in the constraint stress to the initial stress. The stress release rate is deduced as follows [27]:…”
Section: Stress Release Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the ratio of soil diameter had little effect on the support pressure when the working face was damaged, and the limiting support pressure had a linear relationship with the roadway diameter. Sun [19] studied the evolution mechanism of roadway face instability under different foundation conditions, and they defined three failure modes: front extrusion, front caving, and back caving. Lei [20] conducted a series of transparent clay model tests on the active stability of the shield face adjacent to the existing tunnel, based on the excavation process, failure mode, influence range, and support force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling test and field measurements are widely conducted to estimate tunneling-induced deformation, providing valuable engineering guidance for practical applications. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]18,19 In many cases, the safety of existing structures should be evaluated before tunnel excavation to adjust the construction scheme, which is difficult to achieve through field measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an interesting topic in urban underground engineering, three types of approaches have been employed to study the soil–structure interaction: empirical approach, numerical approach, and analytical approach. Modeling test and field measurements are widely conducted to estimate tunneling‐induced deformation, providing valuable engineering guidance for practical applications 11‐17,18,19 . In many cases, the safety of existing structures should be evaluated before tunnel excavation to adjust the construction scheme, which is difficult to achieve through field measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%