Model Test and Numerical Simulation of Water Conservancy Foundation Bearing Capacity

Abstract

In order to further improve the construction quality of water conservancy projects under different soil conditions and ensure the safety, stability, and durability of water conservancy project foundation construction under special circumstances, this study takes the bearing capacity of water conservancy land foundation as the research direction, takes frozen soil foundation and bag gravel pier composite foundation as examples, and further optimizes the parameters of foundation bearing capacity by using the theory of foundation ultimate bearing capacity and related algorithms. The P-S curve of bearing capacity shows that when the foundation is frozen to −15°C and the foundation sum is about 190 kN, the P-S curve trend at this time changes significantly, which is not different from the indoor simulation result of 170 kN. The final numerical analysis of foundation bearing capacity is relatively reliable, which can provide a powerful reference for the calculation of foundation bearing capacity of hydraulic engineering.

Study on the Influence of Water Erosion on the Bearing Capacity and Function of the High Pile Foundation of the Wharf

“…Furthermore, it is important to consider the impact of water-related disasters, such as floods and tidal actions, on the stability and safety of high-pile foundations. Particularly in riverine and marine environments, variations in water flow intensity and direction can cause soil erosion around the pile foundations, thereby increasing the risk of structural failure [3][4][5][6].…”

Retracted: Model Test and Numerical Simulation of Water Conservancy Foundation Bearing Capacity

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”