2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-28633-2_63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Theory for PRS-Like Agents: Modelling Belief Update and Action Attempts

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, we extend our earlier work on modelling the mental states of PRS-like agents by considering the dynamics of belief and modelling of action attempts. The major constraint on our theory is that belief update is modelled within the theory of action as part of the logic ADL, a logic of belief, desire and intention that incorporates propositional dynamic logic. Some logical properties of belief update and attempts are given. The account provides a more complete modelling of both the statics… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their future-directed aspect, actions of the agent are modelled as attempts with no guarantee of success; viewed from the aspect of the (ongoing) present, the world is modelled as a sequence of states that actually occur, and intentions are incorporated into such models. The approaches of Cohen and Levesque [4] and Wooldridge [21] are of the latter type, taking as a starting point models of actions inspired by computational logic; those of Rao and Georgeff [14,15] and Wobcke [17,19] are more oriented towards the future-directed aspects (so notions of the agent's possible actions and the failure of an agent's attempts are more pertinent in these approaches). However, the main difficulty is to capture both present-directed and future-directed aspects of intention in one formalism.…”
Section: Critique Of Previous Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In their future-directed aspect, actions of the agent are modelled as attempts with no guarantee of success; viewed from the aspect of the (ongoing) present, the world is modelled as a sequence of states that actually occur, and intentions are incorporated into such models. The approaches of Cohen and Levesque [4] and Wooldridge [21] are of the latter type, taking as a starting point models of actions inspired by computational logic; those of Rao and Georgeff [14,15] and Wobcke [17,19] are more oriented towards the future-directed aspects (so notions of the agent's possible actions and the failure of an agent's attempts are more pertinent in these approaches). However, the main difficulty is to capture both present-directed and future-directed aspects of intention in one formalism.…”
Section: Critique Of Previous Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In earlier work, Wobcke [17,19], motivated by these problems, we developed a logic called Agent Dynamic Logic (ADL), in which possible worlds corresponded to branching-time execution structures of an agent program, and in which intentions referred to actions successfully performed by the agent. In Wobcke [18], we showed how to automatically derive various logical properties of intention.…”
Section: ])mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, we present an approach to representing the execution structures, including the agent's beliefs and intentions, for any PRS-type agent program, Georgeff and Lansky [3], in a reachability graph, as in Spin, Holzmann [4]. The construction is based on our logical approach to Agent Dynamic Logic, an extension of PDL that includes modal operators for belief, goal and intention, Wobcke [7,8]. The notion of intention is a more "rational" version of the operational notion used in PRS-type systems, though does not capture all the complexities of Bratman's theory [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This project includes development of a precise operational semantics that synthesizes a number of properties common to various PRS-like architectures, Wobcke [16], and the development of formal approaches to the semantics of the mental notions employed in this type of architecture, Wobcke [17], extended to belief update and the modelling of success and failure through action attempts, Wobcke [18]. To make this paper self-contained, many of the formal details must be omitted: the reader is referred to this earlier work for such details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%