2007
DOI: 10.1353/ajm.2007.0018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model theory of the Frobenius on the Witt vectors

Abstract: We give axiomatizations and prove quantifier elimination theorems for first-order theories of unramified valued fields with an automorphism having a close interaction with the valuation. We achieve an analogue of the classical Ostrowski theory of pseudoconvergence. In the outstanding case of Witt vectors with their Frobenius map, we use the ∂-ring formalism from Joyal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
88
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
88
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…• We prove a similar result in the isometric case, where an Ax-Kochen-Ershov principle holds as well [Sca03,BMS07,AvdD11].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…• We prove a similar result in the isometric case, where an Ax-Kochen-Ershov principle holds as well [Sca03,BMS07,AvdD11].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Note that, if k L has characteristic zero, then one has L n = L 1 and ac n = ac 1 for all n 1. We also write ac for ac 1 .…”
Section: Non-archimedean Yomdin-gromov Parametrizations With Taylor Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From now on in Section 3, definable sets and functions will be so for the language L. Note that the study of definable sets was initiated in the works of Macintyre [25] and Denef and van den Dries [19] in the p-adic case, and was generalized later to this and other settings in for example [1,12,14,36].…”
Section: Non-archimedean Yomdin-gromov Parametrizations With Taylor Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[23] or [3]). On the face of it, Theorem 2.6 is not first-order expressible, but we shall show that a failure of Theorem 4.1 may be converted to a failure of Theorem 2.6.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%