2015
DOI: 10.1002/for.2322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Uncertainty and Forecast Combination in High‐Dimensional Multivariate Volatility Prediction

Abstract: In multivariate volatility prediction, identifying the optimal forecasting model is not always a feasible task. This is mainly due to the curse of dimensionality typically affecting multivariate volatility models. In practice only a subset of the potentially available models can be effectively estimated, after imposing severe constraints on the dynamic structure of the volatility process. It follows that in most applications the working forecasting model can be severely misspecified. This situation leaves scop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metric for evaluating dialect confusion: Since dialect ID can be a challenging task even for native listeners, we evaluated confusion matrices of true vs. guessed accents. We computed Frobenius distance [37,38] between the confusion matrix for dialects of natural speech and those for each TTS system, based on the idea that if a confusion matrix for TTS is similar to the Table 3: Results: MOS and DMOS on a scale of 1-5 for seen (train) and unseen (dev and test) speakers. Synthesis was done using unseen texts.…”
Section: Subjective Evaluation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metric for evaluating dialect confusion: Since dialect ID can be a challenging task even for native listeners, we evaluated confusion matrices of true vs. guessed accents. We computed Frobenius distance [37,38] between the confusion matrix for dialects of natural speech and those for each TTS system, based on the idea that if a confusion matrix for TTS is similar to the Table 3: Results: MOS and DMOS on a scale of 1-5 for seen (train) and unseen (dev and test) speakers. Synthesis was done using unseen texts.…”
Section: Subjective Evaluation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason we recommend using the KL divergence in conjunction with another measure which takes into account the number of entries that have been varied. One such measure is the Frobenius norm, defined below, which has been recently used in econometrics and finance to quantify the distance between two covariance matrices (Amendola and Storti, 2015;Laurent et al, 2012).…”
Section: Divergence Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given the large variety of volatility modelling options, model specification remains one of the main sources of uncertainty we need to deal with (c.f. [12], [37], [2]). In this paper, in light of these source of uncertainty, we evaluate and compare the performance of different models, within the GARCH class, in estimating and forecasting the volatility of cryptocurrencies by means of a Model Confidence Set (MCS) procedure as proposed by [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%