2006
DOI: 10.3182/20060329-3-au-2901.00100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Weight and State Estimation for Multiple Model Systems Applied to Fault Detection and Identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The model weight estimation results obtained with the combined state and weight estimation algorithm (Hallouzi et al, 2006) are given in Figure 3. In this figure, the time interval in which a deviation can be expected from the nominal situation (µ (1) = 1 and µ (2) , .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model weight estimation results obtained with the combined state and weight estimation algorithm (Hallouzi et al, 2006) are given in Figure 3. In this figure, the time interval in which a deviation can be expected from the nominal situation (µ (1) = 1 and µ (2) , .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the fault information will be obtained by estimation of the weights of the models in the model set. The weights will be estimated together with the state by an algorithm largely based on the method proposed in (Hallouzi et al, 2006). However, the main focus of this paper is assessing the FDI capabilities of the proposed fault modeling strategy, therefore the reader interested in the model weight estimation algorithm is referred to the aforementioned reference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the system is transformed into a state space representation, such that classic state feedback control can be applied (Hallouzi et al, 2006):…”
Section: Repetitive Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [25] also an attempt is made to incorporate the errors of the estimates. This attempt resulted in modified versions of (23) and (28), which had to be linearized to allow the two estimation steps to be linear again. However, it was concluded that the performance of the resulting algorithm was not better than the algorithm that used direct substitution of the current estimates.…”
Section: Covariance Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the direct approach in which the state and model weights are jointly estimated is adopted. A novel algorithm for this nonlinear estimation problem is proposed in [28].…”
Section: Ekfmentioning
confidence: 99%