2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeled earthquake losses and social vulnerability in Charleston, South Carolina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
64
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Hazard United States (HAZUS), developed by the US Federal Emergency Management Agency, is a free standardized GIS-based risk assessment tool for hazard analysis and it have been widely validated for its applicability in the U.S. (Kircher et al 2006) (Tantala et al 2008) (Schmidtlein et al 2011) (Remo and Pinter 2012) (Rein and Corotis 2013). Despite the fact that HAZUS was originally designed for the use in the United States, this standardized seismic risk estimation software has been adopted and validated worldwide because it was possible to allow for its modification for international use (Gulati 2006) (Peterson and Small 2012) (Ploeger et al 2010).…”
Section: Hazus Methodology and Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hazard United States (HAZUS), developed by the US Federal Emergency Management Agency, is a free standardized GIS-based risk assessment tool for hazard analysis and it have been widely validated for its applicability in the U.S. (Kircher et al 2006) (Tantala et al 2008) (Schmidtlein et al 2011) (Remo and Pinter 2012) (Rein and Corotis 2013). Despite the fact that HAZUS was originally designed for the use in the United States, this standardized seismic risk estimation software has been adopted and validated worldwide because it was possible to allow for its modification for international use (Gulati 2006) (Peterson and Small 2012) (Ploeger et al 2010).…”
Section: Hazus Methodology and Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the HPM, vulnerability is derived from the interaction of both a geophysical risk and a social response at a specific geographic location. To date, many vulnerability studies that implement the HPM have focused on the combination of geophysical risk and social factors in creating a composite place vulnerability index or map (Clark et al 1998;Cutter et al 2000;Chakraborty et al 2005;Wood et al 2010;Schmidtlein et al 2011;Kar & Hodgson 2012). For example, Cutter et al (2000) combined several geophysical variables and socioeconomic data of Georgetown County, South Carolina to develop geophysical and social vulnerability maps, respectively.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last three decades, most hazard researchers that focused on vulnerability analyses have paid particular attention to the intersection of geophysical risk and social factors in generating place vulnerability (Clark et al 1998;Montz and Tobin 1998;Mileti 1999;Cutter et al 2000;Wu et al 2002;Brooks et al 2005;Chakraborty et al 2005;Cutter & Finch 2008;Wood et al 2010;Schmidtlein et al 2011;Kar & Hodgson 2012). This approach is derivative of the Hazards-of-Place Model (HPM) developed by Cutter (1996) which offers a conceptual framework through which place vulnerability is defined as a combination of social characteristics (expressed by selected socioeconomic demographics) and geophysical risk (expressed by probabilities of occurrence).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En ellos se aprecia la forma en que la pobreza, inadecuada educación y exclusión social han condicionado la vulnerabilidad, así como las profundas limitaciones que han acompañado las etapas de enfrentamiento y recuperación ante los desastres naturales, aunque simultáneamente han surgido actitudes, valores y organizaciones que han enfatizado la solidaridad, colaboración y capacidad de lucha de los habitantes locales. Para evitar que estas actuaciones sean superadas con rapidez es fundamental transformarlas en políticas públicas y organizaciones sociales, para lo cual deben tenerse en cuenta múltiples experiencias acumuladas en otros desastres tales como el maremoto de Indonesia (2004), el Huracán Katrina (2006) y el terremoto y tsunami de Japón (2011).…”
Section: Naturaleza De Los Desastres "Naturales" Y Construcción De Vuunclassified
“…Schmidtlein et al (2011) refieren que un área es vulnerable por quienes viven en ella, pues la vulnerabilidad depende del acceso a los medios de vida y de recursos menos seguros y provechosos. El acceso a los recursos depende, entre otras cosas, de la vinculación con el poder, encargado de la distribución de bienes y servicios.…”
Section: Desastres Socionaturales En La Región De Florianópolis Y En unclassified