2022
DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling activity spaces using big geo‐data: Progress and challenges

Abstract: The growing availability of big geo‐data, such as mobile phone data and location‐based social media (LBSM), provides new opportunities and challenges for modeling human activity spaces in the big data era. These datasets often cover a large sample size and can be used to model activity spaces more efficiently than traditional travel surveys. However, these data also have inherent limitations, such as the lack of reliable demographic information of individuals and a low sampling rate. This paper first reviews t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They discovered that among the external activity space indicators, the ROG is less susceptible to outliers. In contrast, among internal activity space indicators, entropy is frequently utilized in prior research to quantify the randomness of user activity patterns, especially when derived from sparse datasets of LBSM data [ 16 ]. Therefore, we applied the ROG to model the external shape and entropy to model the internal structure of an activity space in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They discovered that among the external activity space indicators, the ROG is less susceptible to outliers. In contrast, among internal activity space indicators, entropy is frequently utilized in prior research to quantify the randomness of user activity patterns, especially when derived from sparse datasets of LBSM data [ 16 ]. Therefore, we applied the ROG to model the external shape and entropy to model the internal structure of an activity space in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different indicators have been used to model the external morphology (e.g., shape and size) and internal structure (patterns of visiting different points of interest) of an activity space [ 14 , 15 ]. Previous studies show that the radius of gyration (ROG) and entropy are the two commonly used indicators to model the external morphology and internal structure of an activity space, respectively [ 15 , 16 ]. ROG is less susceptible to outliers and entropy can capture the randomness of user activity patterns, which are very crucial for sparse datasets like location-based social media (LBSM) data [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiple places at which individuals interact with or are exposed to the food environment can be represented through their 'activity space' (i.e., subsuming people's daily travel patterns and the locations visited [21,22]). While surveys and travel diaries are prone to inaccuracies due to possible recall biases, the use of Global Positioning System(s) (GPS) to define exposure to the food environment is the most accurate method to capture an individual's day-to-day activity space objectively [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. GPS-based food environment studies capture the out-of-home locations and routes individuals visit, thus more precisely capturing the totality and the duration of exposure to the food environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%