2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b03821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Ammonia and Water Co-Adsorption in CuI-SSZ-13 Zeolite Using DFT Calculations

Abstract: Cu-SSZ-13 efficiently catalyzes the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO by NH 3 but the structure of the active site and, particularly, the redox state of the copper (+I or +II) are still debated. This paper focuses on the possible contribution of Cu I species with a theoretical investigation of adsorption and co-adsorption of NH 3 and H 2 O on Cu I species using quantum chemistry and including dispersion forces. The calculations show that Cu I clearly migrates upon adsorption of NH 3. While Cu I is init… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38,39 ■ PHASE DIAGRAMS Recent work indicates that the oxidation state of Cu will depend on the exact environment, that is, the presence of different gases such as H 2 O and O 2 and the temperature. 18,19,22 To calculate the phase diagram, we include Cu sites as extra framework (Cu-EF) atoms close to one Al atom and bound to the defect site with up to six adsorbed H 2 O molecules located in the periodic zeolite framework. While Cu in the Cu-EF-6R and Cu-EF-8R is exchanged for H + and binds to activated O atoms next to Al, we exchange one to three H atoms from the single silanol (Cu-d3H−Cu-d1H) defect and one H atom from the double silanol defect (Cu-d5H) for Cu to allow for a direct bond between O and Cu.…”
Section: ■ Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…38,39 ■ PHASE DIAGRAMS Recent work indicates that the oxidation state of Cu will depend on the exact environment, that is, the presence of different gases such as H 2 O and O 2 and the temperature. 18,19,22 To calculate the phase diagram, we include Cu sites as extra framework (Cu-EF) atoms close to one Al atom and bound to the defect site with up to six adsorbed H 2 O molecules located in the periodic zeolite framework. While Cu in the Cu-EF-6R and Cu-EF-8R is exchanged for H + and binds to activated O atoms next to Al, we exchange one to three H atoms from the single silanol (Cu-d3H−Cu-d1H) defect and one H atom from the double silanol defect (Cu-d5H) for Cu to allow for a direct bond between O and Cu.…”
Section: ■ Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32−35 These either focused on DFT-based calculations, which in principle are not able to describe excited states correctly, 32,34 or used a small cluster model, 33 which neglects the complexity of the zeolite framework. Only in recent work, the rapid coordination changes of Cu cations in zeolites 11,17 have been included, 35 and so far coordination changes in the presence of water [18][19][20]22 have been neglected in spectroscopic assignments. Furthermore, optical spectra have never been correlated to theoretically calculated phase diagrams.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First-principles-based modeling can support and extend these experimental assignments by systematically considering an extensive set of possible active site structures and by calculating their relative thermodynamic stability. , This information can then be summarized in phase diagrams, which reveal the most stable phase under various experimental conditions. Combining the information from phase diagrams with knowledge of the anchoring point distribution enables derivation of the site distribution present in the zeolite material under specific experimental conditions. , In the conversion of methane to methanol using Cu-exchanged zeolites, attempts so far have aimed at describing the relative stability of different Cu sites in mordenite, ZSM-5, or SSZ-13. , These studies, however, considered only few possible active sites, which does not describe the complex distribution of sites expected to be present in such a zeolite system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%