This study contributes to a method based on an aqueous solution of ammonia direct injection for NO x emissions control from internal combustion engines. Many previously published studies about deNO x technology are based on selective catalytic reduction (SCR), but only few deal with inner selective non-catalytic reduction (inner SNCR) technology, which is an intensive improvement of selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) applied in the in-cylinder purification procedure. Before numerical calculations were carried out, the computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulation model was validated with steady-state experimental results. The main results revealed that with the increasing concentration of aqueous solution of ammonia, nitrogen oxides gradually decrease, and the largest decline of NO x is 65.1% with little loss of cylinder peak pressure. Unburned hydrocarbon (UHC) and carbon monoxide (CO) may increase using inner SNCR, and soot emissions show a decreased tendency. However, there is little change when ammonia content varies. Ulteriorly, refining the direct injection phase is of great help to inner SNCR technology to enhance the reduction of NO x and reduce NH 3 oxidation and NH 3 slipping.Energies 2019, 12, 2742 2 of 18 water emulsion diesel as compared with diesel fuel. Adnan et al. [10] conducted an experimental investigation on the optimum water injection timing for power augmentation and emission control of a hydrogen fueled compression ignition (HFCI) engine. The results show that a longer injection duration introduces more water droplets into the cylinder, reducing the in-cylinder charge temperature, which leads to NO x reduction. Although, the amount of water by injecting or emulsifying requires special attention. Excessive water injection may lead to decreased power performance and increased incomplete combustion [11]. Thus, the NO x emissions are limited by increasing the amount of the injected water.SCR has been widely applied in the exhaust after-treatment device of internal combustion engines (ICE). Compared with the three-way catalytic converter (TWC), SCR is not strictly restricted by the equivalence ratio [12]. Thus, the application of SCR has more rationality and scientificity in lean burn gasoline engines and diesel engines. However, the traditional SCR technology has some blemishes, such as poor durability of SCR catalyst [13], narrow temperature window for active deNO x [14], catalyst deactivation due to particulates accumulation [15], catalyst poisoning effect caused by heavy metals (Pb, Zn, and so on, and their oxides) [16], high cost, and difficult recovery by using the noble metal catalysts. The miniaturization and compactification of SCR equipment are also very important factors, which influence the automobile lightweight, especially the passenger car [17]. These limitations led researchers to begin to focus on selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR), which is another technical route to reduce NO x emissions. As a result of getting rid of the reliance on catalysts, engines with SNCR tec...