2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and analysis of dual-layer NOx storage and reduction and selective catalytic reduction monolithic catalyst

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the runs performed with 0.2% of hydrogen (Figure 4a), it is observed that the NO x concentration at the outlet increased throughout the cycles, but 1 v/v % of H 2 is enough for the complete reaction with the adsorbed nitrates. The conversion values obtained in these conditions ( Table 3) indicated that total regeneration is possible when working with reducing agent content around five times the stoichiometric value, which is consistent with other authors [50] for higher flowrates and dual-layer systems. For the runs performed with 2.5 v/v % of H 2 (Figure 4c), the amount of H 2 was overestimated for the regeneration of the catalyst and a minimum amount of NO x was detected (as can be observed in the inset).…”
Section: Lean Phasesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For the runs performed with 0.2% of hydrogen (Figure 4a), it is observed that the NO x concentration at the outlet increased throughout the cycles, but 1 v/v % of H 2 is enough for the complete reaction with the adsorbed nitrates. The conversion values obtained in these conditions ( Table 3) indicated that total regeneration is possible when working with reducing agent content around five times the stoichiometric value, which is consistent with other authors [50] for higher flowrates and dual-layer systems. For the runs performed with 2.5 v/v % of H 2 (Figure 4c), the amount of H 2 was overestimated for the regeneration of the catalyst and a minimum amount of NO x was detected (as can be observed in the inset).…”
Section: Lean Phasesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Modelling dual layer and dual zoned LNT and SCR catalysts has shown that the dual layer catalyst operation was much more complex than the dual zoned catalyst, due to diffusion in the different washcoat layers . In comparing dual zone and dual layer LNT‐SCR systems with a focus on understanding differences in performance and the effect of washcoat thickness, the authors found that the dual layer configuration was the better design compared to the zoned configuration when the LNT catalyst generated large amounts of NH 3 . The dual zone configuration was better when small amounts of NH 3 were generated over the LNT, mainly due to the counter‐diffusion of NH 3 from the bottom LNT layer reacting with the top SCR layer.…”
Section: Selective Catalytic Reduction (Scr) and Lean Nox Trap (Lnt) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no definite agreement in the literature if the dual‐layer NSR–SCR outperforms its sequential NSR+SCR counterpart. From our experiments, we can infer that the NSR+SCR combination provides better features than the dual‐layer NSR–SCR configuration, in agreement with the results simulated by Koltsakis et al., but in contradiction to what was later reported by Shakya et al . Their modelling results showed that the dual‐layer configuration was superior to the sequential double‐monolith.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SCR catalyst should be highly active and preferably inhibit the adsorption of NH 3 . By using individually calibrated global kinetic models Shakya et al . simulated the behavior of the dual‐layer NSR–SCR monolith catalyst.…”
Section: Coupling Of Nsr and Scr Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%