Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003.
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2003.1239109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and compensator designs for self-servowriting in disk drives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that in [6], based on a predesigned feedback control, a feedforward control is designed to contain the error propagation and in [8], an observer-based 2-D control is designed by using a 1-D pole placement method. Different from these ad hoc methods, this brief proposes a systematic 2-D control design method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that in [6], based on a predesigned feedback control, a feedforward control is designed to contain the error propagation and in [8], an observer-based 2-D control is designed by using a 1-D pole placement method. Different from these ad hoc methods, this brief proposes a systematic 2-D control design method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear matrix inequality (LMI) approaches are applied to design the 2-D controllers [3]. The design method is easily implemented and different from the state-estimator based 1-D design method in [9]. With the stored error information of previous track, the 2-D control scheme is realizable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted in the introduction, repetitive processes arise in both physical examples (recently another application has arisen in self-servo writing in disk drives [10]) and in the so-called algorithmic applications already referred to in the introduction to this paper. Hence it is essential to complement the work on stability and systems theoretic properties with the development of control schemes.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Discrete Linear Repetitive Processes Described By mentioning
confidence: 99%