2001
DOI: 10.1109/70.976023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and control of formations of nonholonomic mobile robots

Abstract: This paper addresses the control of a team of nonholonomic mobile robots navigating in a terrain with obstacles while maintaining a desired formation and changing formations when required, using graph theory.We model the team as a triple, (g, r, H), consisting of a group element g that describes the gross position of the lead robot, a set of shape variables r that describe the relative positions of robots, and a control graph H that describes the behaviors of the robots in the formation. Our framework enables … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
530
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,027 publications
(537 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
530
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A promising alternative approach is to leverage the interactions between nodes by controlling only a relatively small subset of nodes (leaders), which act as external inputs and influence the remaining nodes (followers). The leader-follower architecture has been implemented in initial studies of unmanned vehicles [41], in which the leader nodes are controlled by remote operators and the remaining nodes follow the trajectory defined by the leaders. Anchor nodes in localization and time synchronization has also been studied within the leader-follower framework [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A promising alternative approach is to leverage the interactions between nodes by controlling only a relatively small subset of nodes (leaders), which act as external inputs and influence the remaining nodes (followers). The leader-follower architecture has been implemented in initial studies of unmanned vehicles [41], in which the leader nodes are controlled by remote operators and the remaining nodes follow the trajectory defined by the leaders. Anchor nodes in localization and time synchronization has also been studied within the leader-follower framework [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obstacle avoidance method considered is also insufficient in dealing with more complex obstacles and may cause robots to be trapped behind obstacles. Formation control with both one-leader and two-leaders constraints was presented in [3]. Their work focuses on how transitions between formations can be realized via a transition matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigations on this issue have been considered [2,3]. Shao et al [2] consider a one-leader constraint formation control, which produces a non-rigid formation control graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications include master-slave synchronisation of robot manipulators in [21], leader-follower synchronisation for control of mobile robots in [2,11,23,10], and for formation control of marine vessels in [7]. For these applications the models are either fully actuated or formulated only at the kinematic level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%