2005
DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2004.841647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and control of TCV

Abstract: Abstract-A new approach to the modeling and control of tokamak fusion reactors is presented. A nonlinear model is derived using the classical arguments of Hamiltonian mechanics and a low-order linear model is derived from it. The modeling process used here addresses flux and energy conservation issues explicitly and self-consistently. The model is of particular value, because it shows the relationship between the initial modeling assumptions and the resulting predictions. The mechanisms behind the creation of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the main issues to overcome in the path to commercialization is the instabilities [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. These instabilities cause disruptions, limiting the maximal achievable time for plasma confinement and making indispensable an optimal control system.…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main issues to overcome in the path to commercialization is the instabilities [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. These instabilities cause disruptions, limiting the maximal achievable time for plasma confinement and making indispensable an optimal control system.…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering a zero order hold discretization, the system (4) may be rewritten in matrix form as 1 ( 9 ) where is the manipulated variable that correspond to the plasma current, is the internal inductance and is the space state vector. Since this model has as input, it will be changed to suit a design purpose in which an integrator is embedded.…”
Section: Model Predictive Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference with the model found in the previous section is that now we will allow separate inputs for boundary and resistive voltages. Choosing a relative weight 1 k ≤ for B V , and a relative weight ( ) 1 k − for the R V input, the steady state solution of (58) is automatically guaranteed to match the steady state solution (28).…”
Section: Non Linear System Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%